Boosting the Potential of Large Language Models with an Intelligent Information Assistant

2025.03.22 Back to posts

Boosting the Potential of Large Language Models with an Intelligent Information Assistant

Authors:

🎉 Supported by NeurIPS 2024

GitHub NeurIPS

🎯 Introduction

With the rise of Large Language Models (LLMs), significant advancements have been made in the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP). However, these models often generate incorrect information, a phenomenon known as “hallucination.” Traditional Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) methods have shown inadequate performance in handling complex reasoning tasks, particularly those that require multiple steps.

Motivation

The motivation for developing the ASSISTRAG framework includes:

  • LLM Hallucination: LLMs frequently produce inaccurate information.
  • Inadequate RAG Performance: RAG methods struggle with complex and multi-step reasoning tasks.
  • Impact of Prompting and Fine-Tuning: Techniques like prompting and fine-tuning can degrade the original capabilities of LLMs.
  • Need for Frequent Retraining: Maintaining performance requires timely retraining of the models.

🔬 ASSISTRAG Framework

2.1 Main Components

The ASSISTRAG framework consists of two primary components:

  • Main LLM: Static, responsible for generating answers.
  • Assistant LLM: Trainable, responsible for information management.

2.2 Core Functions

ASSISTRAG possesses six core capabilities:

Memory Management

  1. Retrieving Relevant Information: Retrieve relevant information from the system’s memory based on the current question.
  2. Evaluating Relevance: Determine if the retrieved information is relevant to answering the current question.
  3. Storing New Insights: If the main LLM generates new insights that are not already stored in the system’s memory, record them for future use.

Knowledge Management

  1. Question Decomposition: Break down the question into multiple sub-queries.
  2. Knowledge Retrieval: Retrieve relevant documents from an external knowledge base to support the sub-queries.
  3. Knowledge Extraction: Extract the necessary knowledge from the retrieved documents to answer the original question.
  4. Evaluating Relevance: Determine if the extracted knowledge should be included in the response generation process.

Other Core Functions

  1. Tool Usage: Retrieving information from both internal memory and external knowledge bases.
  2. Action Execution: Processing, analyzing, and extracting information.
  3. Plan Specification: Determining the necessity of each step in the process.

📚 Training Methodology

ASSISTRAG employs a three-phase training approach:

  1. Foundational Curriculum Learning:

    • Establish the assistant’s basic capabilities.
    • Gradually increase the complexity of training tasks.
    • Ensure the assistant can handle a wide range of queries.
  2. Specialized Curriculum Learning:

    • Focus on enhancing the assistant’s abilities in specific domains or reasoning skills.
    • Introduce more challenging tasks and scenarios.
    • Refine the assistant’s knowledge and problem-solving strategies.
  3. Reinforced Preference Optimization:

    • Adjust the assistant’s output based on feedback from the main LLM.
    • Optimize the assistant’s responses to better align with the main LLM’s preferences.
    • Ensure the assistant’s outputs are consistent with the main LLM’s desired outputs.

📈 Experimental Setup and Results

4.1 Experimental Setup

Experiments were conducted using multiple complex question-answering datasets to evaluate the performance of ASSISTRAG.

4.2 Experimental Results

  • ASSISTRAG demonstrated superior performance across various foundational LLMs, particularly providing significant benefits to weaker models.
  • The framework exhibited advantages in accuracy, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness.

🏁 Conclusion

The proposed ASSISTRAG effectively enhances LLMs’ performance in complex reasoning tasks. Future work will focus on expanding the assistant’s capabilities, including long-text processing and personalized support.

📖 References

Comments:

  • This is a shared paper, not written by me.
Bart Simpson

Anna Chen

CS Grad Student

I'm a CS grad student specializing in NLP and full-stack development, turning complex data into meaningful insights.